The Democratic Party is moving forward with a determined scheme to find (create?) an astonishing 1.7 million new Democratic UOCAVA (Uniform Overseas Citizen Voting Act) voters in 7 swing states who live, work, or travel overseas. election season.
From the DNC memo dated August 12, 2024:
For the first time in a Presidential cycle, the DNC is investing in Democrats Abroad.
The DNC is doing the work to win in battleground states across the country.
With less than 100 days until Election Day and before the Democratic National Convention, the DNC announced a significant six-figure investment in Democratic VoteFromAbroad, for the first time in a Presidential cycle, help finance efforts to win the votes of approximately 9,000,000 Americans– of which only about 8% are registered voters as of 2020 – who live or serve outside the United States.
Here’s the problem with the DNC’s goals:
The DNC’s stated goal of winning the votes of approximately 9 million Americans through the Democratic Abroad website appears unlikely, as according to a new report from the federal government’s FVAP website, only 4.4 million US citizens live overseas, and only 2.8 million of them choose age.
While awaiting election results, the media and election officials often refer to late-arriving ballots as “military votes.” This is a misnomer. Special absentee voting privileges, previously reserved for the military, were expanded to include US citizens living abroad, even those who have never lived in the United States.
According to Heather Honey of Verity Vote, UOCAVA requires states to allow members of the U.S. Armed Forces, family members, and U.S. citizens living outside the U.S. to register and vote absentee in elections for Federal office. There was broad support for programs that allowed service men and women to exercise their right to vote, but this was not the primary outcome of the UOCAVA program.
Prior to 2016, the majority of voters exercising the privileges associated with UOCAVA were military voters. This program has been drastically expanded through the use of electronic Federal Post Card Applications and now dominated by non-military demands. The application does not require identity or citizenship verification before registering or receiving a ballot, and no eligibility verification is required before voting.
In 2020, uniformed service members and eligible family members 37% of the UOCAVA ballot return to the country. More than 63% of the returned ballots were attributed to non-military overseas participants.
In the memo, the DNC reminded everyone how close the 2020 election results are (no one is allowed to question them) and why they won’t give it a chance in 2024:
In 2020, only 44,000 votes in Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin won Joe Biden the presidency. In fact, out-of-state voters made a significant difference in Georgia and Arizona during the 2020 presidential elections and made a difference in close races in Connecticut, New Hampshire, and North Carolina during the 2022 midterms. regardless of where they live.
In addition to the DNC memo conveying its intentions, surrogates from the Obama regime, such as Bruce Heyden, the former US Ambassador to Canada, have begun a public relations campaign to inform the public about the scheme. By enabling Hollywood celebrities, left-wing musicians, and top Democrats like Nancy Pelosi to promote a plot to collect votes from millions of individuals who do not have proof of identity for the public, the Democrats created a blueprint to eliminate the votes of millions of legal US citizens who live there. in America it seems normal.
Watch Obama’s former ambassador explain the plan to MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski:
Mika Brzezinski, host of
that’s embarrassing @Morning_Joe share in @MSNBCsat down with Barack Obama’s US Ambassador to Canada, Bruce Heyman, to discuss the Democrats’ plan to steal our November 2024 election.Democrats apparently held secret meetings with celebrities, social media… pic.twitter.com/oTL8cq1YAO
– PattyMI (@PattyLovesTruth) September 20, 2024
In the memo, the DNC reminded everyone how close the 2020 election results are (which no one can question) and why they won’t give it a chance in 2024:
In 2020, only 44,000 votes in Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin won Joe Biden the presidency. In fact, out-of-state voters made a significant difference in Georgia and Arizona during the 2020 presidential elections and made a difference in close races in Connecticut, New Hampshire, and North Carolina during the 2022 midterms. regardless of where they live.
According to the DNC memo, Democrats claim their goal is to get a staggering 340,840 NEW votes for Democrats from UOCAVA Voters.
In the must-win state of Pennsylvania, 5 United States Congressmen, Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, Rep. Dan Meuser, Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson, Rep. Lloyd Smucker, and Rep. Mike Kelly, have filed claims against the top election. officials, PA Secretary of State Al Schmidt and Deputy Secretary of Elections Jonathan Marks, through “guides” to clerks at UOCAVA or Overseas Voters. The instructions tell us to ignore the voter’s Pennsylvania identification and address verification requirements.
According to the lawsuit, filed yesterday by Erick G. Kaardal and Elizabeth A. Nielsen of Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, the Pennsylvania Election Code establishes that a UOCAVA application can be denied if “an omission prevents the election official from determining that the UOCAVA applicant is entitled to vote.”
To be eligible under Pennsylvania law, applicants must “meet the voting rights requirements of the Commonwealth including residency requirements.“
To verify identity and eligibility and to determine if the application is valid, the Federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) establishes minimum standards. Applicants seeking to vote in federal elections must provide, when registering, a valid driver’s license number. If an individual has not been issued a driver’s license, they can use it the last four digits of the social security number (or if you don’t have it, the State can give you a unique identification number and verify your identity and have the right to use other approved documents).
In direct conflict with federal and state law, Commonwealth Defender Secretary Al Schmidt or Deputy Election Secretary Johnathan Marks, or both, have issued directives and guidance to county officials to exempt UOCAVA applicants from all verification requirements.
The Defendants’ non-verification position has been confirmed in their sworn testimony before the General Assembly.
When asked about how UOCAVA applicants are verified at the PA House 2022 hearing, Deputy Secretary of Elections, Johnathan Marks, testified: “That group of voters is specifically exempted from the HAVA verification requirements. They do not have to provide a PennDOT ID or the last 4 SSNs. There is no systematic verification ,” he said boldly.
The non-verification positions by the Defendants in the case, PA Secretary of State Al Schmidt and Deputy Secretary of Elections Jonathan Marks are also confirmed in the 2023 Pennsylvania Military and Foreign Affairs Voter Guide, which includes the “position” of the Department of State.
“The Department’s position is that the electorate is closed exempt of ID card requirements for absentee voters.”
Defendants cannot cite any legal authority, statutory or otherwise, as a valid legal basis for the protected “position” of voters exempt from identification requirements because no such exemption exists in state or federal law.
According to the lawsuit:
Commonwealth practice is the election process is structured illegally which makes Pennsylvania elections vulnerable to ineligible votes by individuals or entities who may purport to be UOCAVA-eligible, register to vote without verifying their identity or eligibility but receive ballots via email, and then vote their ballots without providing identification at any step in the process .
All voters should be asking why Democrats are working so hard to pass election laws before the upcoming 2024 election.
For anyone who thinks UOCAVA votes don’t matter in this election—in the 2000 presidential election, only 629 votes separated the race between George W. Bush and Al Gore in Florida. When the overseas absentee votes finally came, George W. Bush was able to take a lead of 537 votes from Al Gore and win the presidency.
Read the lawsuit below:
