Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach announced Monday that he is suing pharmaceutical giant Pfizer for misleading Kansas residents about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine.
During a press conference in Topeka, along with Deputy Attorney General Fran Oleen and Assistant Attorneys General Kaley Schrader and Melanie Jack, Kobach explained the charges filed against Pfizer.
“Pfizer made numerous misleading claims to deceive the public about the vaccine when America needed the truth,” Kobach said.
The complaint, filed today in Thomas County District Court, alleges Pfizer misled Kansans about the risks of the vaccine, including potential harm to pregnant women and the risk of myocarditis. The suit also alleges that Pfizer falsely claimed the vaccine was effective against a variant of COVID, despite evidence to the contrary.
Pfizer has also been accused of suggesting the vaccine prevents the transmission of COVID-19 despite admitting it has not yet studied whether the vaccine stops transmission.
The State of Kansas asserts several specific allegations in the lawsuit:
1. Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.
2. Pfizer says its COVID-19 vaccine is safe despite knowing the COVID-19 vaccine is associated with serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, pregnancy failure, and death. Pfizer is hiding this critical safety information from the public.
3. Pfizer says its COVID-19 vaccine is effective despite knowing that the COVID-19 vaccine is in decline and does not protect against variants of COVID-19. Pfizer hides this critical effectiveness information from the public.
4. Pfizer says the COVID-19 vaccine will prevent the transmission of COVID-19 even though it knows it has never studied the vaccine’s effect on the transmission of COVID-19.
5. To prevent the public from learning the truth, Pfizer is working to censor speech on social media that questions Pfizer’s claims about the COVID-19 vaccine.
6. Pfizer’s misrepresentation of its “safe and effective” vaccine cost the company $75 billion in revenue from sales of the COVID-19 vaccine in just two years.
7. Pfizer’s actions and claims related to the COVID-19 vaccine violate a prior consent decree with the State of Kansas.
8. Pfizer’s actions and claims related to the COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, KSA 50-623 et seq., regardless of whether any individual consumers ultimately received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
9. Pfizer must be held accountable for misrepresenting the benefits of the COVID19 vaccine while hiding and suppressing the truth about the vaccine’s safety risks, reduced effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission.
You can read the complaint here.
WATCH:
BREAKING: Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach is suing Pfizer for “misleading Kansans about the COVID vaccine.”
Kobach accused Pfizer of misleading Kansans about the vaccine’s side effects, such as miscarriage and myocarditis.
“Pfizer made numerous misleading statements to deceive the public… pic.twitter.com/RNB8sA7oER
— Truth In Media (@Truth_InMedia) June 17, 2024
Gateway Pundit previously reported that in a case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and other plaintiffs against the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the court accepted the plaintiffs’ claim that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine does not meet the traditional definition. vaccines because they do not prevent the spread of the virus but only reduce the symptoms.
In its decision, the 9th Circuit held that the district court had misapplied the precedent set by Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which supports mandatory smallpox vaccination because of its effectiveness in preventing the spread of the disease. The court noted that the plaintiffs’ claims, deemed true at this stage, show that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively “prevent the spread” of COVID-19, thus warranting further consideration of the allegations.
9th Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Plaintiff’s Claim That COVID-19 mRNA Jab Is Not a Vaccine, But a Therapy
