Beating the campus: Pennâs Dishonorable Bribe
âThe University of Pennsylvania tried to make a dealâ with law professor Amy Wax, sanctioning âto waterâ her âif she agreed to stop discussing â and criticizing â her treatment at the hands of the university. She refused,â reported Aaron Sibarium of the Washington Free Beacon.
âThe university took no action against cartoonists who depicted âZionistsâ drinking the blood of Gazansâ or âagainst students and professors who celebrated the worst pogrom since the Shoah.â But it chastised Wax for saying that diversity officers âcanât be scholars if their lives depend on it.â
âIt is rare for a university to sanction a professor who has been a professor and is all but unheard of if he engages in political speech. Penn made an exception for Waxâ â âa blow to precedent for academic freedom.â
Libertarian: North Fork Eminent-Domain Outrage
If New York âcan hide false claims of public use, property rights â and the Fifth Amendment â become meaningless,â Arif Panju argued.
Brothers Ben and Hank Brinkmann in 2017 âtried to build a hardware store on their own land in Southold, Long Island.â
The officials âtried various ways to block the plans of the brothersâ; when that failed, âSouthold took the Brinkmannsâ land using eminent domain,â which essentially âlied about âpublic useâ to disguise compliance with the Fifth Amendment.â
The city claims it needs âland for âpassive use parks.â It is an empty field. In other words, the common usage is false.
âBrinkmann v. Town of Southold now at the Supreme Courtâs doorâ; judges may âhold the government accountable for lyingâ and ensure that âconstitutional protections are meaningful.â
Conservatives: Climate Activists Infiltrate Courts
âJudicial bureaucrats help left-wing dark money groups exploit the judicial system to destroy Americaâs traditional energy companies,â flagged Sen. Ted Cruz on The Hill, a collaboration between the âFederal Justice Center (FJC), the federal agency responsible for research and education for federal judges and judicial staffâ and the âleftistâ Climate Justice Project, where court staff are seen âhelping left-wing climate activists lobby and direct judges behind closed doors.â
The Environmental Law Institute âlaunches the Climate Justice Project to provide judges with âclimate science educationâ âand the law.
But âthe CJPâs funding comes from the same source to withdraw climate change lawsuitsâ; partnership with the FJC is âcontrary to the independence of the judiciary and the mission of the FJC. It must stop.â
Watch social media: Vance Leaves Harris in Dirt
If you havenât noticed, Sen. JD Vance âis very online,â observes Steve Krakauer on The Hill â and thatâs âgoodâ: The GOP veep nominee âuses social media in a way that no American political figure has before,â for example earlier this month when he âresponded to a brief comment about X about daycareâ with a âpoint-by-point, 350-word policy dissertation.â
The talking heads considered it âreally funny how JD Vance dropped his entire policy manifesto in a Twitter reply,â while âKamala Harris couldnât describe a single policy at this level of detailâ in her interview.
And social media output under Harrisâ name suggests she doesnât know the âpassword to log into her account.â
Everything is useless and empty.â âPerhaps being Extremely Online isnât such a bad thing â especially when compared to the emptiness of the opponentâs ticket.â
Energy table: Bullies for Wind Power
After the offshore wind blades broke, âNantucket residents expressed concern about officialsâ handling of damaged turbines and environmental hazards from large fiberglass blades falling into the ocean,â said Emmett Hare in the City Journal.
Environmental groups âdownplayed the episode,â with the Sierra Club arguing that it would not âimpactâ the use of âoffshore wind.â Complaining Nantucketers have been smeared as âtools of the fossil fuel industry.â
But it will take more than smears âto convince the people of New England and the coast of the country that fiberglass and foam washing up on the coast is no more than a conservative talking point.â
â Compiled by the Post Editorial Board