Mark Zuckerberg, the so-called champion of innovation and democracy, has turned Facebook and Meta into a dystopian nightmare, silencing voices deemed inappropriate and manipulating the flow of information.
The billionaire’s obsession with censorship has turned what was once a platform for free expression into a digital gulag where conservative viewpoints are systematically suppressed.
Since the 2020 election, his platform has been at the forefront of harassing conservative voices, all while hiding “fact-checking” and “misinformation control.”
Let’s not forget the controversial donation of hundreds of millions of dollars to election efforts during the 2020 race – funds used to strengthen liberal strongholds under the pretext of supporting “election infrastructure.”
The so-called “Zuckerbucks” scandal sent shock waves through conservative circles, with many actually accusing Zuckerberg of meddling in the election process to sway the results in favor of the Democratic Party.
The millions that go into local elections are, in fact, an effort to vote by increasing the number of voters in Democratic districts.
Read more about Zuckerbucks:
The 2021 revelation that the Biden regime forced Meta to remove content related to COVID-19 showed how deep his collusion with the left-wing elite went.
Instead of upholding free speech, Zuckerberg bent the knee, fervently censoring any narrative that didn’t align with the Biden regime’s agenda.
Its willingness to serve as the Biden regime’s personal propaganda machine further underscores that Meta is not a neutral platform—it’s an extension of the left’s totalitarian playbook.
Last month, Zuckerberg openly admitted that Meta, Facebook’s parent company, was under relentless pressure by the Biden regime to censor content related to COVID-19, even if the content was satirical or humorous, and Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop.
Meta’s CEO allegedly expressed deep ‘regret’ for not being more vocal in resisting the government’s demands, stating that “the government’s pressure was wrong,” and that he now knows his company needs to be more outspoken about the administration’s overreach.
Zuckerberg’s latest so-called “regret” is nothing more than political theater.
Zuckerberg’s descent into authoritarianism is not new. Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit, you really spoke before Congress in 2018.
TGP discussed and brought evidence on the censorship and removal of conservative content on Facebook.
Transcript of my testimony:
Over the past 19 months, Gateway Pundit has seen a decline in Facebook traffic from 24% of total website traffic in January 2017 to 2% of total website traffic in June 2018.
This is an 88% drop in Facebook traffic.
Recently we analyzed the traffic numbers for some of the top conservative publishers in the US That was found only surprising. Just as Gateway Pundit has been removed by Facebook from being seen by readers, Facebook removes 93% (2) of the combined referral traffic to these websites from January 2017 to May 2018.
The Western Journal site and other conservative websites under the umbrella have more than billion page views in 2016. Since the organization lost 75% of Facebook traffic. Likewise, Klicked Media, host of more than 60 conservative websites, lost 400 million page views from Facebook in the last six months compared to the previous year. The total number of pageviews lost(3) by just these two conservative online publishers is more than 1.5 billion pageviews from Facebook in one year.
After the 2016 election, Facebook began making algorithmic changes to ensure conservative news was no longer an option for users. Two studies released in March 2018 confirm this. A study by the Outline Organization (4) found conservative publishers hit hardest by recent Facebook algorithm changes — and The Gateway Pundit hit hardest.
Meta’s billionaire CEO has reportedly hired a Republican strategist in an effort to repair his damaged relationship with the conservative media, according to the New York Times.
But don’t be fooled by this sudden change – it’s nothing more than a desperate attempt to rebrand itself after years of totalitarian censorship that has silenced conservative voices on Facebook and Instagram.
The New York Times reported:
Instead of engaging publicly with Washington, Mr. Zuckerberg repaired relations with politicians behind the scenes. After the “Zuckerbucks” criticism, Mr. Zuckerberg hired Brian Baker, a prominent Republican strategist, to improve his position with the right-wing media and Republican officials. In the lead-up to the November election, Mr. Baker has emphasized to Mr. Trump and his top aides that Mr. Zuckerberg does not plan to make the same donation, people familiar with the discussion said.
Mr. Zuckerberg has yet to establish a relationship with Vice President Kamala Harris. But in the summer, Mr. Zuckerberg had his first conversation with Mr. Trump since he left office, according to people familiar with the conversation.
During the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Mr. Trump thanked the billionaire on the phone for saying publicly that he was “praying” for Mr. Trump after the latest assassination attempt, according to people briefed on the call.
Just a few weeks later, they spoke again.
After Meta mistakenly took pictures of the assassination attempt that went viral on Meta, Mr. Zuckerberg immediately called the former president and apologized for the mistake, according to two people familiar with the conversation. Representatives for Mr. Trump and Mr. Zuckerberg have offered differing accounts of what happened on the call.
“Private conversations between President Trump and other people are just that — private,” said Steven Cheung, a spokesman for the Trump campaign.
According to the NYT, Zuckerberg is now trying to portray himself as “libertarian or classical liberalism.”
It’s a desperate ploy to save Meta’s image among conservatives who have long abandoned his platform.
Meta’s track record speaks for itself: censorship, suppression, and manipulation of public discourse. Whether it’s silencing conservative voices or pandering to progressive elites, Zuckerberg’s totalitarian control over information is a serious threat to the fabric of free speech and democracy. We must not allow slippery rebranding to trick us into complacency.
